Can you take us through the legislative process for introducing and passing a bill like this in Nebraska? What does that look like?
February 2023: A hearing for LB 471 took place, aiming to incorporate the bill into the existing Architecture & Engineering (A&E) Act.
September 2023: Senator Tom Brewer called an Interim Study Hearing—hearings that committees hold during the interim sessions, periods between regular legislative sessions, that can inform what lawmakers will focus on. These hearings are great opportunities for experts, advocates, impacted people, and the public to get legislators’ attention while they’re not quite as busy as they are during the regular session.—
November 2023: Senator Brewer’s office called two stakeholder meetings with all interested parties. It was decided not to pursue joining the A&E Board, and instead to be regulated under the State Treasurer’s office. This was then sent to the Senator’s office, then to people who draft the bill..
January 20, 2024: LB 16 underwent a second reading,and the new language was added as an Amendment titled “The Interior Design Voluntary Registration Act,(AM 2120),” and the amendment passed 34-1.
February 29, 2024: LB 16 and AM 2120 passed the final reading 42-1.
March 5th 2024 – Governor Jim Pillen signed the bill into law, securing stamp and seal privileges for interior designers in the state of Nebraska
Our team consisted of:
Lobbyists Julia Plucker and Sean Kelley—they were instrumental and this quite literally would not have happened without their guidance.
The National Consortium for Interior Design, Marci Merola from IIDA, Matthew Barusch from the Council for Interior Design Qualification (CIDQ), and Lauren Early from The American Society of Interior Designers.
Jessica Dolittle, former VP of Advocacy, Nebraska, from the IIDA Great Plains Chapter
Marilyn Hansen, a 50-year ASID member and current president of ASID Nebraska-Iowa
Kendra Locklear Ordia, IIDA, ASID, Assistant Professor at University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Was there any particular challenge you faced in passing the bill?
One of the most challenging parts was communicating how this policy would protect the public—that it is necessary for our right to work independently—and not just for marketing. Even once we established that the current Nebraska law was restricting my ability to practice independently (for example, we could not work on business occupancy spaces greater than 3,000-square-feet and assembly spaces greater than 1,000-square-feet) and that this was a barrier to my right to have a lawful occupation, many people still held the unconscious bias that we mostly pick finishes. This was difficult to correct and required persistent examples of what I do on a day-to-day basis to protect the public.
Legislatively we knew that without a priority designation, our language would not be heard on the floor of the Unicameral. Broadly speaking, LB 16 is a comprehensive rewrite of Nebraska's Occupational Regulation laws. Luckily LB 16 already had support from both sides of the aisle, and our language was a logical amendment.